Maria Sara Popa vs Laura Samson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 08:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sara Popa vs L. Samson

ROU
0
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Popa 0 - 0 Samson
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Popa | 0 |
| Samson | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
M. S. Popa vs L. Samson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. S. Popa vs L. Samson Match Preview:
- Second Serve Efficiency: Laura Samson and Maria Sara Popa have closely matched second serve performance, with Popa holding a slight edge at 37.00% compared to Samson's 36.11%. How crucial is this difference? Slight but notable in close matches.
- Return Game Proficiency: Popa is marginally stronger in returning both first (39.21%) and second serves (55.00%) than Samson, who records 34.98% for first serves and 54.10% for second serves. Does this give Popa an advantage? It suggests a potential edge in breaking serves.
- Breakpoint Resilience: Samson excels under pressure, saving 47.13% of breakpoints compared to Popa's 43.67%. Can this be a decisive factor? It indicates Samson's ability to fend off potential breaks more effectively.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Samson boasts a higher win percentage at 65.31%, surpassing Popa's 52.70%. Does this reflect current form? Samson's consistency is beneficial.
- Surface Strength: Both players excel on Clay, each with a 71% win rate, while both are less successful on Indoor Hard surfaces. How does this affect predictions? Equal footing on favored surface; neutral court surfaces could challenge both.
- Game Level Experience: Samson has a better winning percentage (69.57%) in higher-level ITF tournaments, compared to Popa's 51.16%. Does this suggest superior experience? Potentially, as stronger competition often hones skills.
- Opponent Quality: Samson has competed against slightly higher-ranked opponents than Popa on average, indicating experience with tougher matches. How does this influence potential outcomes? Could contribute to mental readiness for high-pressure situations.
- Deciding Set Records: Both players show an identical deciding set win rate at 46%. Will this be important if the match gets close? Provides no clear advantage for tie-break scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance trends, both Laura Samson and Maria Sara Popa demonstrate notable strengths and weaknesses that set the stage for a competitive match. Popa's marginally better performance in returning serves hints at a potential advantage when applying pressure on Samson's serve.
Samson, however, has shown resilience in clutch situations, with a superior track record of saving breakpoints. This resilience, coupled with her higher overall win rate over the last year, suggests a consistent level of play against various opponents.
Though both players share similar clay court proficiency, the complexities of playing on different surfaces bring additional variables into play. Ultimately, based on Samson's experience against tougher competition and her ability to perform under pressure, she appears to have a slight edge. Thus, Laura Samson is more likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Maria Sara Popa vs Laura Samson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
M. S. Popa Recent Matches Played
L. Samson Recent Matches Played

M. S. Popa vs L. Samson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.80% (154/127) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.02% (349/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.03% (3131/2887) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.71% (12/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.79% (141/103) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 138 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1249 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:24:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 66% (9569/14503) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (5544/9569) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (2012/4934) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (979/1940) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (6915/14280) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.33% (72/63) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.86% (81/59) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (151/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (17/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (46/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (149/131) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 12% (149/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (132/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |